Sadly due to ridiculous unstoppable spam monsters this blog is moving to Wordpress. Find me there at:
http://redlegsinsoho.wordpress.com and please follow me if you would like. Minn x
Vintage Londoner with retrocentric tastes. Interested in the uncommon,artistic,cultural and visual life of this old tart of a city and its tawdry glamour. Tinctured with cocktails, swear words and the odd rant. I'm friendly but bolshy and my opinions are honest and sponsor-free. P.R and marketing types please see 'About Me'. redlegsinsoho@me.com
Tuesday 1 October 2013
Wednesday 6 February 2013
Penhaligons relaunch flagship store in Regent Street.
Let me start by apologising for lack of blog posts recently, paid work got in the way and words for lucre were hard to resist with the festive season fast advancing upon me! Hello to new readers and thank you to those who have persevered!
I used to wine taste
competitively. This was not an excuse for inebriation; I don’t require one of
those although it was sometimes a consequence. Generally the wines were
spat out; the taste swilled from your mouth with water and then blotted out with dry
crackers before ingesting the next liquid. It was almost entirely about smell.
Smell has always mattered to me, I think that a childhood of allergies and near
constant colds made those periods when I could smell precious. And growing up in households where food was
constantly being cooked, cakes baked and pipes smoked but where the actual
physical environment could be grim it was smell rather than sight that made my life richer.
When not afflicted with a cold I
have a keen sense of smell. It was easy for me to identify notes of leather,
bark, petrol, damp feathers and moth balls in expensive wines. I’m not precious
about niffs, even noxious ones can be intriguing. There is a fine line between
nasal beauty and disgust and I have always thought that the best smells have
and edge of decay or body fluids to them. I’m considering them at the moment
because a history of one of the famous wine tasting competitions I was involved
in is shortly being published and because I have also recently been to a few perfume
industry related events. Perfume or wine, the act of deconstructing them is a
very similar process. The major difference is that perfume is ingested in a
different way. It lies upon our skin reacting with our bodily temperatures and is thus transmuted. Wine works its transformation more internally and
corporally. But both affect our mood, behaviour and physiology. Whilst some
experience a graphic physiological synaesthesia response to smell anyone with an ounce of
imagination can make the obvious connections. A wine is a sharp grassy green; a scent
is a warm bronze. The language of wine is imbued with rich deep shades,
leather, pewter, flashing glass and the patinas of old woods. The interiors of
the best bodegas, chateaus and wine merchants reflect this sensual language of
wine, a language of smell supported by taste and vision.
Penhaligon's previous decor. |
View of the new Penhaligon's store interior |
Scent has a wider range of
ingredients and source materials than wine and is perhaps a more overtly sensual
experience. Yet it seems to me that its visual language has been demeaned. I
know I have a weakness for luxury but that does not exclude simplicity. I love
the scent of Jinko, Cedar and Yuzu, and I love the simple wooden lines, woven
tatami and delicate traced papers that visually accompany it; in my mind at
least. However I find the shiny cheap metallic trim, the polished white.. what
is it; Formica? - the black faux onyx ‘simplicity’ of many perfume
stores/counters utterly depressing. No
one is going to deny the importance of ‘branding’, identity or advertising to
any company but you look back at the elegant illustrations used to advertise
scent in the thirties and compare them to the soft porn photography that is
common currency today (and yes I know I have banged on about this before) and
despair. Overt sex is not sexy nor sensuous nor erotic: it is tacky.
Recently I attended the re-launch
of the Penhaligon’s flagship store in Regent Street which has been redesigned
by Christopher Jenner, who has form due to his work with Diptyche. Penhaligons are heritage brand and particularly good for daytime
scents and male niffs (always had a soft
spot for a finely scented male). Their traditional square cut glass bottles
tied with bows and interesting scent specific labels are established motifs.
The challenge for them as with many ‘traditional’ brands is how to avoid Laura
Ashley style ossification whilst not taking the (not necessarily bad) faintly
Eurotrashy route of Burberry. Their bottles are to some degree an ‘untouchable’
and effective design formula and to some degree sacrosanct.
The Regent Street Store has, with
its vintage glass fascia always had a touch of the jewel box about it, I liked the old dark shop too but perhaps it was a little forbidding and had a look that has been adopted by too many other brands. The
current designer appears to have appreciated this, it still looks like a jewel
box but one that has been smuggled into Mayfair via a Victorian lady travellers
travelling chest, with detours to China and the Raj. The colour scheme of Eau
de Nil and purple pink zings and appeals to me intensely. I love that uncertain and
slightly corpse-like green-blue. Despite its Frenchified name it always seems
to me to be peculiarly English: the colour of an Aesthete's jade tie pin, English utilitarian tea cups,
1920’s tea gowns and onyx Deco cigarette lighters. As a counterpoint a Schiaparelli
like pink with a mauvish hue has been used, particularly effectively in the
large pendant lamps hanging from fortuitously high ceilings. These have, in
their turn been decorated with a tribute to English tudor ceiling fretwork. The square shapes of the iconic bottles and
the bows adorning them have been worked into most elements of the store’s
design including the beautifully tiled floors. Besides the entrance the range
is placed in back-lit chamfered boxes for no reason other than to display the
bottles as desirable objects. Yet these are placed in a tactile studded leather
wall which invites touch.
The overwhelming ambience of the shop
is of an opulent ladies drawing room of the high Edwardian era. This kind of
interior is not unusual, various brands utilise it. Penhaligon’s have staked
their claim to difference by incorporating what could almost be described as a ‘chappist’
approach. Paper labels from perfumes decorate feature walls and things are just a
bit eccentric. This was reflected at the launch by their collaboration with
Hendrick’s gin and the presence of the delightful Kit and one of their always
decorative barmen. Their now established uber-English take on gin cocktails served in the almost ubiquitious tea cups complemented
Penhaligons approach well. And in any case who can argue with good gin,
especially when accompanied by pretty macaroons?
Money has been spent on the
redesign in terms of craft, most notably on the floor and the
marquetry walls. Is it just me, or does a properly crafted environment reflect
a properly crafted product? Luxury can be off– putting but efforts have been
made here to counter this by making the store more interactive. The bottles are
arranged traditionally on shelves but in addition there is a table with the
entire range accompanied by sample strips; a kind of ‘taste me’ approach. This
encourages a browsing of scents, of comparison and double checking. Personally
I dislike having a member of staff interceding in my sniffing but I like them
there when I have a question or can’t find something. This is why Liberty's
often get my money, they seem quite tolerant of the customer just getting on
with things.
Penhaligons are sensible to have designed their shop to appeal to different kinds of customer. In a sense this is ultra-modern, reflecting the move to niche and personally designed scents at the top end of the market. Yet is still operates within the ambit of a major commercial brand. It is possible to market democratically whilst luxuriously and it is possible to use conventional imagery imaginatively. Shops like Penhaligons and their attitude to their perfumes and their customers are a standing challenge to an industry that increasingly relies on a faux puritanical imagery or pseudo-scientific hygiene fetish to sell products that often deserve better. It could be countered that a quality scent doesn’t require excessive adornment but perfume, like wine is a balm and excitement to the senses. We have proved resistant to good wine being stored in cartons or sold in sterile environments, which as it is a food stuff makes more sense than in the presentation of scent. Penhaligon’s approach suits their perfumes and the shop is a joy, like suddenly coming across a violet cream in a box of plain truffles. Certainly the Malabar skin cream I was given makes me smell rather like a delicious piece of confectionery.
Penhaligons are sensible to have designed their shop to appeal to different kinds of customer. In a sense this is ultra-modern, reflecting the move to niche and personally designed scents at the top end of the market. Yet is still operates within the ambit of a major commercial brand. It is possible to market democratically whilst luxuriously and it is possible to use conventional imagery imaginatively. Shops like Penhaligons and their attitude to their perfumes and their customers are a standing challenge to an industry that increasingly relies on a faux puritanical imagery or pseudo-scientific hygiene fetish to sell products that often deserve better. It could be countered that a quality scent doesn’t require excessive adornment but perfume, like wine is a balm and excitement to the senses. We have proved resistant to good wine being stored in cartons or sold in sterile environments, which as it is a food stuff makes more sense than in the presentation of scent. Penhaligon’s approach suits their perfumes and the shop is a joy, like suddenly coming across a violet cream in a box of plain truffles. Certainly the Malabar skin cream I was given makes me smell rather like a delicious piece of confectionery.
Padded leather wall.
Penhaligon's website can be found here.here
|
Friday 23 November 2012
The two worst words in the English language ?
If you work in an environment
where the sick and dying are never far you are naturally reminded of your own
mortality. However I like many readers of this blog I am intrigued and
fascinated by decades gone; I’m a Historian. I’d like to think of myself as
having one foot in the past rather than one foot in the grave. It is curious however, that in an age of ever
increasing life spans and good health we seem less equipped to deal with the
passing of time and our mortality or more to the point living the life we have
fully. I’ve been struck in the last couple of months about how cautious and
guarded people are: with their time, their affections and their passions. Those
who are older seem constrained by what has happened to them already, often
rather than learning from the past they are living by it and seem constrained
and over analytical.
More curious however is the
conservatism of the young, is it a generational thing this strong sense of
caution? Perhaps the post-Thatcher generations, technology savvy and entitled
have been hit harder by the recession and the removal of things the
baby-boomers (I’m not one) saw as ‘rights’.
It cannot be because I become from a particularly privileged group
generationally (1980’s working class Britain was quite grim) that it appears
that we were and remain somewhat livelier. I did always think that recession
resulted in a greater appreciation of the things that matter in life: love,
friends and living. Is technology to blame? After all enough money for a half
pint of strongbow in a pub, an evening of leaping around in a darkened room
with a noisy band or tearing around London causing mayhem were all you could do
to alleviate boredom in the 80’s. No computers, no internet, no Nintendo WII.
The best freely available entertaining activity generally simply required
another reasonably attractive human being who was ‘up for it’. No accident that
we were all fairly slim too..
Now many life decisions appear to
be sadly reliant on one of the worst words in the dictionary: ‘caution’. I’m
not complaining about common sense but caution- that mealy-mouthed Daily Mail
of a word. The word that stops people from trying things, jumping in feet first,
asking people out, having fun, staying up late, taking a punt, having a fling,
placing a bet. Caution results from being scared, nervous, underestimating
yourself and others and every time it wins it results, to my mind, in a small
death.
I don’t mean you should do things
you don’t want to, or dangerous things or that you have to be some insane loud lunatic
throwing dice in the air although that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. The
phrase: ‘throwing caution to the wind’ has a meaning of liberation and
freedom for a good reason. Caution is not
‘taking care’, rather it is not caring; a flattening of experience. So we end
up with corporate clothing, corporate lives, dull lives. I’m not known as a
cheerful soul myself but I have made the trade-off between hard work and wealth
in favour of useful work and enough to pay my way. Enough to spend a good
weekend (just gone) at Rhythm Riot, the rockabilly weekender with hundreds of
people who were together and determined to enjoy themselves. Every single risky
decision I have made has done me no actual harm, caused no regrets and more
often than not enriched the life I have managed to have so far.
In the happy bus at Rhythm Riot (picture courtesy of Bex Shaw). |
Enjoyment and pleasure in others,
the world, your surroundings is an admirable aim not an irresponsible one. If
you can help others to feel the same even better if this can be done without
causing problems or at cost to others. Because if one truism really is a truism
it is that life is very, very very short.
NB: the other word I dislike is ‘Stilton’
Thursday 1 November 2012
All Tomorrow's (and yesterday's and today's) Parties.
It is only appropriate now that
Halloween has just passed us by like a phantom in the hallway and the festive
season fast approaches that I find myself having read two very different books
on the subject of parties: Suzette Field’s
‘A Curious Invitation: The Forty Greatest Parties in Literature’ and
Angel Adoree’s ‘The Vintage Tea Party Year’. One is concerned with the literary form the other with the literal..
A Curious Invitation |
In literature the party can indeed be a curious thing. As a device it is extremely useful yet demonically difficult to write.
Try it. The combination of ambience, multiple characters and narrative are a
challenge. Most of us can
rely on the anthropological mesh of convention to hang our own idea of what an event is upon:
weddings, Christmas parties, bar mitzvahs. The party in literature is a crucial
route in writing to bring characters together in a way that we can recognise and personally I find it far more convincing than the convention of accident. For me it is more natural that an Austen heroine should be made to wince at a Ball than be scooped up by a handsome stranger in a storm. Where would the traditional British crime novel be without the cocktail party, surely as essential to the genre as a locked room? We all,
love them or loathe them, find ourselves in a party at some point in life and they
provide a microcosm of all the loving and loathing and hating and joy life
provides.
It is therefore surprising that a
book on this subject has not yet been written and fortunate that it has
been written by someone so well qualified to do so.
I used to go to a lot of parties, events and balls before I was ill and it is how I am
acquainted with the writer. She was and is involved in throwing parties, soirees and events that sometimes frankly defy description. It may be that throwing a good party requires
the same insights as the creation of an imaginary one and I feel that this reveals itself not only
in the quality of the writing in this book but the choices the author makes.
You may, like me, find there are some included that are surprising
and others that are omitted. I was delighted to see The Masque of the
Red Death Party from Poe's eponymous work, The Beverly Hills Party (Hollywood Wives, Jackie
Collins) and Satan’s Rout (The Master and the Margarita, Mikhail Bulgakov) included in the selection. I would have added one of Anthony Powell’s or
Ford Madox Ford’s parties myself, there are several memorable examples. But this is one of the points of the book, it makes you think about what you have read and how
novelists write about the party. It would be a good read for a book club; another kind of party.
Suzette Field (photo Sin Bozkurt) |
The party, the get-together, the
piss-up. These may be viewed as
ephemeral, flippant and superficial to some degree in literature. Suzette Field’s
book is a firm reminder that this is not in reality the case. Cinema gets this. Think of
the wedding in The Godfather, or a film such as Greenaway’s The Cook The Thief
His wife & Her Lover. Even Star Wars contains in its early scenes characters
partying away in Chalmun’s Cantina.
It does seem that we plan our parties today with less attention, less finesse. The excuse is ‘lack of time’, but this cannot be true.
Do we have less leisure time than our grandparents? I look back at photographs
of knees ups in the depressed twenties and wartime Britain. Decorations, special
food, special clothing and special drinks. My favourite picture is of my great grandparents in
early fifties austerity Britain wearing jaunty cowbow hats decorated for some
reason with bells. Now we have more time, more money but we farm our events out
to ‘planners’, buy in all our food and decorations, the latter often cheap and
shiny. The holding of an event is a
chore rather than a pleasure and one of the most endangered social creatures at
present seems to me to be the thrower of parties for the sake of it, the salon
hostess, the master or mistress of ceremonies.
The Vintage Tea Party Year |
The other book about parties I
have read recently is Angel Adoree’s The Vintage Tea Party Year. Don’t be too
taken in by the ‘vintage’ element of the title, this book is not another field
guide to polka dots, cupcakes and penny black nostalgia. It contains recipes,
but many are meaty, strongly flavoured, unusual and historic in origin and
flavours. The book is quirkily and charmingly designed and suggests ideas for
parties, not necessarily tea based. There is plenty of alcohol involved too.
What is refreshing here is Angel’s mission to suggest that flamboyance,
imagination and not too much effort should be put into holding things. I
commend her suggestion that written invitations should be used (we all rely too
much on the horror of the Facebook invitation) and that any kind of object can
be brought in to make a party memorable. It is really not a case of spending
money, showing off or making your life stressful. I can vouch for the recipes
which are makeable, some are simplicity itself. This isn’t a prescriptive book,
it is creative and inclusive, I particularly enjoyed the chapter which
suggested that, shock, horror, the boys might want to play with tweed, alcohol,
savoury food and male fripperies without a frilly petticoated girl-wife in
sight. Despite the physical charm of the book there is something subversive here; don't buy it, don't do it the way the glossies tell you to do it, don't get new stuff, make it, grab stuff where you can if it suits....
Any one can make a cheese and pickle sandwich... |
I think the books
actually work quite well together, even though they are very different. I’d be
delighted to receive both in a hamper with a bottle of champagne, a waitrose voucher
and an exhortation to ‘have a ball’. In
these mealy-mouthed times of corporate boredom, mass-produced living and sheer ennui our contribution to ending the recession should be to spending our time making some investment in our social lives and trying to make life a little less mundane.
'A Curious Invitation: The Forty Greatest Parties in Literature. Suzette Field (Picador 2012)
‘The Vintage Tea Party Year’
Angel Adoree (Mitchell Beazley 2012)
Both hardback, both available on Amazon.
Tuesday 2 October 2012
Goodwood Revival 2012
It has been a while since I
posted here, Summer raced by and what a nasty wet one it was. Now it is
shocking to see the mince pies on the supermarket shelves and a pleasure to see
the leaves change colour; Autumn is my favourite season.
The stand out event of the last
month was for me the Goodwood Revival. I haven’t been before, I am not a ‘petrol
head’ and have always been more drawn to the horseracing. This year however
things came together, I was able to join the Chap Magazine Olympiad crowd who
had been invited to display their sporting prowess at the event. Additionally a kind friend was prepared to put
me up in Lewes which is one of my favourite English towns. I knew it would be a
good weekend when I arrived and a cosy drink in the Lewes Arms was followed by
a delicious meal prepared by my friend’s parents.
Fleur de Guerre (photo), Bethan and myself on the flying chair thingy. |
I knew that the Goodwood Revival
was the ‘vintage’ inclined event and that Goodwood had dabbled with the scene
by holding with Wayne Hemingway a Goodwood Vintage event a couple of years ago
which had spawned various controversies. At the same time I was aware this was
a serious three day weekend of motor racing, motorbike racing and aeroplane fly
bys and displays. I was not sure how I
would find this, I don’t even drive. In fact I did actually have to stop one
friend mid eulogy about some automobile engine and say ‘I am very sorry but I
don’t have the faintest idea what you are talking about’. Basically for me a
car is pretty, glamorous or suits my outfit. I care rather more about the
person driving it and whether I can have a ride in it than any technical
specifications. But I do have to say there were a great many very very pretty
cars. There is also pleasure to be derived from being around enthusiasts having
a great time in nearly all environments ( although some things, like dogging,
or EDL demos are best avoided).
Gustav lighting the Olympic Pipe. |
There was a great deal to keep
the vintage/retro/history fiend busy. The roar of racing engines is a fine
backdrop to pootling around in your finery, even better were the aeroplanes
whizzing around the skies, wellington bombers, spitfires and on one evening a
plane with a brightly lit propeller were constantly whizzing through the skies distracting
you from the shopping, drinking, eating and automobile porn all around.
My 40's housewife look. |
Retro wise there was something
for everyone. There were various high
points. I loved the jolly faux fight between mods and rockers outside the retro
Tescos, just typing that makes me smile. The Dad’s Army re-enactors were fun,
and whilst in forties civvy street clothing on the Sunday I found myself
flanked by Lance Corporal Jones trying to give me some sausages and Private Joe
Walker trying to sell me black market nylons. Shortly after this we had a very
civilised cup of tea with Harry and Edna in their CC21 display area. Nearby there were also live camels, party of
a Lawrence of Arabia themed exhibit. The
Chap Olympiad fitted extremely well into all this, providing an extra dose of
surreal nonsense and particularly delighting families, after all what child is
not entertained by men in hats battering each other with umbrellas? We were ‘on’three
times a day, the audience were happy to participate and groups of people came
back to watch it again. There was a
diverse range of entertainment available, including Mr B the Gentleman Rhymer
in the Speckled Hen Tent and Black Elvis in the Butlins tent. There was also
dancing, lots to drink and eat and of course, the racing.
Chap Olympiad participants. |
This is an expensive event, but
unlike some others I won’t be churlish enough to mention it was good value. The
sheer number of vehicles, the racing, the vintage events, the shopping and the
atmosphere were excellent. Lord March and his team seem to be pitching it very
well to appeal to a wide range of visitors whilst, despite the crowds still
maintaining an element of glamour. I
would love to obtain access to some of the ‘clubs’ and private pavilions but
was very happy to meander around generally. The cold war theme adopted this
year was applied with humour, I particularly liked the Sputnik satellite that
had crashed by the entrance. This event
is great fun and I am looking forward to next year. I could even grow to like
the smell of petrol and the roar of engines..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)